14th Speech in Noise Workshop, 12-13 January 2023, Split, Croatia 14th Speech in Noise Workshop, 12-13 January 2023, Split, Croatia

EEG-based assessment of listening effort in deaf and normal hearing persons

Giulia Cartocci
Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy

Listening effort represents a hot topic in auditory cognitive neuroscience[1] [2], and it is well-known that a typical paradigm able to elicit such particular cognitive effort is represented by speech in noise tasks. Furthermore, in the last years it has been ever more felt the need for the identification of an “objective measure of listening effort”[3] [4], aimed at identifying more sensitive assessments of the way an auditory task is undertaken by a listener, especially in case of hearing impairments. Among these measures based on neurophysiological measures we can coarsely divide between measures based on central nervous system activity and autonomic nervous system activity, and EEG-based indices belongs to the former ones. In the area of research I am presenting it was employed the paradigm of speech in noise task in association with the study of EEG rhythms, essentially parietal alpha [5] [6] and frontal theta [7] [8] as indices of listening effort.

It is interesting to investigate listening effort both in children and adults, given the frequent difference in the etiology of deafness in these two populations, more often related to congenital reasons in the first group and to a later acquisition in the second group. Concerning children with asymmetric hearing loss, we found significantly higher parietal alpha power levels in the “binaural noise” and in the “noise to the worse hearing ear” conditions (that were difficult but still feasible conditions) than in the “quiet” (too easy) and “noise to the better hearing ear” (too difficult) conditions (p < 0.001) [9]. Conducting the same paradigm on adult unilateral cochlear implant users, we similarly found during the noise to the worse hearing ear condition, in the pre-stimulus phase, higher levels of parietal alpha power, in accordance to a preparatory role for alpha [5] for attended stimuli. Furthermore, we found higher levels of frontal theta power during the listening phase of the same condition, that also reported the higher percentage of correct responses, supporting a more sustained effort but also higher processing and efficiency for it [10]. Concerning children, we also investigated single side deaf patients, in comparison to normal hearing children, undergoing as well a speech in noise task. Results suggested for both theta and alpha rhythms that normal hearing children by default lateralized in the left hemisphere in the Broca’s area, while single side deaf children lateralized on the base of the background noise direction [11].


  • [1] R. McGarrigle et al. (2014) “Listening effort and fatigue: What exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’”, Int. J. of Audiol., doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.890296.
  • [2] M. K. Pichora-Fuller et al. (2016) “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)”, Ear and Hear., doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.
  • [3] C. Bernarding, F. I. Corona-Strauss, R. Hannemann, D. J. Strauss (2016) “Objective assessment of listening effort: Effects of an increased task demand”, in 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, doi:10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591527.
  • [4] C. Bernarding, D. J. Strauss, R. Hannemann, H. Seidler, F. I. Corona-Strauss (2014) “Objective assessment of listening effort in the oscillatory EEG: Comparison of different hearing aid configurations”, in 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, doi:10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944168.
  • [5] J. Obleser, N. Weisz (2012) “Suppressed Alpha Oscillations Predict Intelligibility of Speech and its Acoustic Details”, Cereb. Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr325.
  • [6] N. Weisz, T. Hartmann, N. Müller, I. Lorenz, J. Obleser (2011) “Alpha rhythms in audition: cognitive and clinical perspectives”, Front. Psychol., doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00073.
  • [7] M. G. Wisniewski, E. R. Thompson, N. Iyer, J. R. Estepp, M. N. Goder-Reiser, S. C. Sullivan (2015) “Frontal midline θ power as an index of listening effort”, Neuroreport, doi:10.1097/WNR.0000000000000306.
  • [8] M. G. Wisniewski, E. R. Thompson, N. Iyer (2017) “Theta- and alpha-power enhancements in the electroencephalogram as an auditory delayed match-to-sample task becomes impossibly difficult”, Psychophysiol., doi:10.1111/psyp.12968.
  • [9] P. Marsella et al. (2017) “EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss”, Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol., doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.05.006.
  • [10] W. Klimesch (1999) “EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis”, Brain Res. Reviews, doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00056-3.
  • [11] G. Cartocci et al. (2019) “EEG rhythms lateralization patterns in children with unilateral hearing loss are different from the patterns of normal hearing controls during speech-in-noise listening”, Hear. Res., doi:10.1016/j.heares.2019.04.011.

Last modified 2023-01-06 23:41:06